A couple of days ago I received and email from HackerRank. They invited me to solve one of their challenges so⦠Thatās what weāre going to do now!

You are in charge of the cake for your nieceās birthday and have decided the cake will have one candle for each year of her total age. When she blows out the candles, sheāll only be able to blow out the tallest ones. Your task is to find out how many candles she can successfully blow out.
For example, if your niece is turning 4 years old, and the cake will have 4 candles of height 3, 3, 1, 2, she will be able to blow out 2 candles successfully, since the tallest candles are of height 3 and there are such candles.
Function description
Create a function:
birthdayCakeCandles. It must return an integer representing the number of candles she can blow out.
birthdayCakeCandleshas the following parameter:arr- an array of integers representing candle heights.
As you can see itās pretty simple, but if they challenged me⦠I have to solve it! :smiley:
You can find the challenge on HackerRank.
Note: Before reading forward, Iād recommend that you solve the challenge on your own first. Than you can take a peak š on my solutions.
First solution - the cleaner way
For this one weāre going to do a couple of steps:
- create a variable which will store the highest candle height. Letās call this variable:
max - (a) loop over the array and (b) increase a
countereverytime the currentitemis equal tomax - if the
itemis higher thanmax, reset thecounterand also setmaxto be equal to theitem - at the end, return the
counter
(item is the current candle height from the given arr)
function birthdayCakeCandles(arr) {
// Step 1
let max = 0;
let counter = 0;
// Step 2 (a)
arr.forEach(item => {
// Step 3
if (item > max) {
// Step 4
max = item;
counter = 1;
// Step 2 (b)
} else if (item === max) {
counter++;
}
});
return counter;
}

Second solution - the clever but not optimal way
We could also use some ātricksā to make it easier to understand the code, without having to use both if and else if statements.
This time letās do the following:
- use
Math.max+ thearray spreadoperator to get the maximum value from the array - use the arrayās
filtermethod to return an array with only themaxvalues - return the length of this
filtered array
function birthdayCakeCandles(arr) {
let max = Math.max(...arr);
return arr.filter(item => item === max).length;
}
Itās not the optimal way because are looping twice over the array (int the Max.max and the filter methods).
Third solution - the one-liner
(Or the worst but most satisfying way ā¤ļø)
You might know (or if you donāt, ask my friend: jenovs) that I like the reduce function so everytime I can, I love using it, including this time. š
So⦠for this one, weāre going to use a ternary operator twice because one ternary operator can only handle 2 cases at a time. Plug another one in and you can have 3 cases: š
item>maxitem=maxitem<max
Also, the default value of the acc (accumulator) would be an object where weāre going to save the two values we need: max and counter.
Other than that we just have to use the ālogicā from the First solution - sort of⦠:wink:
- If the
maxis less than theitemwe save it and reset thecounter. - Else if the
itemis equal to themaxwe increase the counter and we spread the rest of the object (although we only have one prop and we donāt have to use thespreadoperator. We could just re set themaxagain, but⦠itās nice to see the three dots syntax š ). - Else, just return the
object
And at the end, we return the counter prop of the returning object.
const birthdayCakeCandles = arr =>
arr.reduce(
(acc, item) =>
acc.max < item
? { max: item, counter: 1 }
: acc.max === item
? { ...acc, counter: ++acc.counter }
: acc,
{ max: 0, counter: 0 }
).counter;
Conclusion
Thatās all we have for now⦠a simple problem with a simple solution. š
As always, I had fun coming up with all these solutions. Which one did you like the most?
Maybe you found another solution⦠Iād like to see it so let me know. You can brag about it! š